Two administrators talked for two hours Monday morning about the mostly nude photo of a student — and talk is all they did.
Terry Mena, associate dean of students, and Michael Gaede, director of student media, knew the picture would be a problem only after the subject of the photo claimed that OwlTV Station Manager AJ Jordat violated her privacy.
The 20-year-old female student, who wanted to stay anonymous, wants the photo to disappear and her story to be heard. Jordat posted the photo as an official FAU OwlTV tweet on Feb. 16. It shows a woman’s body, shoulders down, wearing nothing but a bra and panties. The accompanying tweet: “These ‘Spanish girls love me like I’m on Twitter’ — she didn’t get the memo that sexting is dangerous; at least no face.”
So what did these two men do when they got an email from the girl on Feb. 18, claiming that Jordat “violated her privacy and abused his position”? Well, they discussed policy and censorship. In short, political nonsense. They didn’t talk about the girl, but about the institution.
In the email, the woman tells her side of the story and details how she came to send the photo: “On Wednesday (2/15) evening, he told me he wanted to make me a ‘Hooter Hottie of the Week.’ He said I’d have to come in and audition. I didn’t want to, and asked if I could just send him a photo. He said I could, and promised he’d be the only one to see it.”
Jordat defended his actions and used it as a selling point for “Sex & the University,” an upcoming OwlTV show.
“That’s the danger of sexting,” he explained. A tweet posted by OwlTV soon after the photo was posted read, “We seemed to have shocked our followers with that last Tweet… But that was the point. “Sex & The University” COMING SOON!!”
So, in hopes of talking to someone who is as disturbed by the incident as I am, I turned to Gaede. No luck. As sometimes happens when talking to administrators, I was fed a lot of talk about new policies and “implementing guidelines to assure this doesn’t happen again,” as Gaede put it.
I was met with similar feedback when speaking to Mena. Talks of guidelines and becoming a more “traditional” student media office took our conversation in directions that helped to avoid the point.
This was no longer a discussion about a young woman who felt humiliated, this became an issue of university policy. I had been looking for some sort of regret and that’s the one thing I didn’t find. Their university appointed positions aside, Jordat and the administrators still showed no remorse.
The real problem is not one that can be solved with a series bureaucratic ramblings and the induction of even more rules and guidelines. The real problem is that this situation was handled solely by men. The station manager of OwlTV? A man. The director of student media? A man. The associate dean of students? A man. As a result, the woman who felt betrayed was left in the dust while codes of conduct took the spotlight.
“This says something about the male dominance of leadership,” explained Gaede. Jordat didn’t consider how the young woman would be affected. The men involved in the situation let their positions get the best of them.
As the editor-in-chief of the UP, I commend the Office of Student Media for allowing a news outlet to practice free speech. As a woman, though, this is a problem that should have been addressed without getting distracted by university policy.
The photo should have never been posted online and you don’t need to be a “student media leader” to understand that. The photo became the problem. The woman in the photo? She’s no longer a factor. How she felt when she realized her body was being used as a gimmick didn’t matter anymore — it never really did.
Now, we’re left with a woman who feels completely violated and the only thing that matters to the men involved is how new policies and provisions will help “move student media forward.”
All of this when, really, someone should have just sat him down and said, AJ, stop being a scumbag.
Charles Dickens • Feb 29, 2012 at 9:48 pm
While I understand the UP’s reporting of this incident, it seems like the UP and OwlTV are so divided and spiteful towards each other that they’re making an embarrassment of FAU’s Student Media. Take past editor Gideon Grudo’s FAU Student Media twitter and its consistent bashing and drama with OwlTV’s AJ Jordat, for example, and you’ve got a pretty good idea of how illogical this whole “war” between these two organizations is.
Mr. Drupheo • Feb 29, 2012 at 12:07 am
I doubt that switching AJ’s penis for a vagina woud change his opinion on the matter. Same for the other men. So, I doubt that their being male is the X factor here.
If the girl is being truthful when she says AJ promised not to release the pic, then he violated her trust. Forget privacy for a second, that’s just plan unethical, assuming it’s true.
Osama • Feb 27, 2012 at 11:58 am
This “journalist” actually worked for OWLTV before she quit when it was too demanding!
Mark Twain • Feb 27, 2012 at 2:19 am
Seems like she should give up newspaper writing and switch to broadcast. Everyone knows print is on the down and out, plus I hear OwlTV needs some peons. She would make a good peon..
Father Ray O'Conner • Feb 22, 2012 at 6:39 pm
This writer should give up trying to be a journalist for Lent. Amen!
Nikki Minaj • Feb 22, 2012 at 2:32 pm
hi i am nikkin minaj
yo yo – if you dont wanna be embarassed don’t be sending photos of you in lingerie, only i NIKKI MINAJ can do that!
Nevin Brown • Feb 22, 2012 at 12:15 pm
Dear TV station manager : Spanish hoes love me like i’m AVENTURA, not twitter. fail!!!
A REAL Journalist • Feb 21, 2012 at 8:03 pm
Are you seriously trying to pass this off as a real story? This sounds like an opinion piece, and a story like this deserves sources and a real attempt at telling this young lady’s story. That’s what journalism is really about. Even an opinion piece. Shame on you for putting your opinion first. You’re supposed to report FOR THE PEOPLE.
Look again • Feb 21, 2012 at 11:10 pm
So If you look carefully, observe, and research like “A REAL Journalist” you would notice that this is a Commentary in the Opinions section…
Tom From Myspace • Feb 22, 2012 at 2:27 pm
If you had kept up with this article, you’d notice this was moved to the “Commentary Section” only after the article started to attract some attention. It was officially in the News section of the home
page and was only moved once UP noticed that people thought the story was an example of bad journalism and extremely bias.
A Real Journalist • Feb 24, 2012 at 3:12 pm
I admit my mistake in not noticing that this was a commentary at the beginning, but it didn’t sound like one to begin with. So, excuse me for relying on my instincts to detect an opinion piece. And thank you, Tom from Myspace. :0
Stewie Griffin • Feb 21, 2012 at 8:01 pm
“AJ, stop being a scumbag”
How does one expect to become a professional journalist by writing a biased statement like this? Mariam really screwed herself with this one.
Charlie Sheen • Feb 21, 2012 at 6:06 pm
This guy AJ is winning! He must have tiger blood… This guy, regardless of whether he is a scumbag or not, managed to legally pull off this stunt and get all you people talking about this show. If you ask me it was effective and provoking. Heck, he should have my job!
Kim Jong Il • Feb 21, 2012 at 3:13 pm
Wow, what a star-studded comment board this is!
Moammar Gadhafi • Feb 21, 2012 at 6:52 pm
Wait a minute, aren’t you dead?
Em Jay • Feb 21, 2012 at 2:38 pm
This is getting good…
Em Jay • Feb 21, 2012 at 4:04 pm
They took the link down. Here it is again…
Cher • Feb 22, 2012 at 12:23 am
Omg, that was good. lol
EL Guapo • Feb 21, 2012 at 1:17 pm
I bet she’s sent a lot more revealing shots before!
Plus think about who you are sending it to? You don’t talk with a reporter and ask them to keep it quiet, you should know better.
Name Here • Feb 21, 2012 at 12:59 pm
You want to be serious? Fine. Dear AJ,
First and foremost, you were hired because you were the only candidate who applied for the position. Even other people who are in Student Media (who I will not name-drop) had told XXXXX that you were hired because they did not want to go through another selection because it would loose time. Even through the first selection previously where you weren’t the only candidate, the judging committee didn’t even want to come close to handing you the keys to the TV station.
Secondly, the reason why you were left with “four employees” was because people left because people did not want to deal with the political BS that entails with joining Owl TV nowadays. I don’t know if the rules have changed, but I don’t think Student Government allows you to have 45 staffers, my guess is 4-5 out of the seven are paid and the rest volunteers who are there acting as peons help you keep your station alive?
Besides the fact, do you really think the people working at Owl TV now are actually learning how to be a professional editor, cameraman, anchorman/woman or are they actually unpaid volunteers who handle your production work because you can’t do it yourself? You should be happy that your Student Media Director has a lot of professional experience in television, otherwise you’d be up a dark creek without a paddle.
Thirdly, let me give YOU an ethics lesson. We are going to assume that the girl sent you the photo of her that you tweeted. She needed to sign a waiver saying that you are free to use the image of her in lingerie in any way shape or form for advertising/marketing purposes. Even if she sent you the photo, how would you like it if I were to Photoshop a scandalous picture of you that you took and then post it online for millions to see without your permission? When the girl took the photo of herself, she owns the copyright to that photo and when she sent it to you, SHE STILL OWNS THAT COPYRIGHT! Only by using a legal form such as a waiver does she give you consent to freely use her photo. To put it this way, you not only invaded her privacy, but you infringed basic copyright!
So when you are doing “Hooter Hottie” next time, have each girl auditioning sign a waiver (or some sort of legal document) which should accurately describe what you are planning on doing with any of the print/visual material that they submit. You cannot just assume that each girl will “Have their audition pictures posted online.” This is why there are agencies and agents who create and sign very long and detailed contracts for models, so that way one doesn’t get an article written about him/her infringing privacy.
Frankly, you are embarrassing yourself and all of Student Media and your constant irrelevant chicanery against the University Press is not going help your case. In fact, you are embarrassing the UP by trying to make light defense of this matter; the girl was “NEARLY nude” (as in not naked but still wearing a small article of clothing covering her private areas) (I used my brain for that one!) and I’m sure you didn’t make her sign a waiver for you to use her picture for marketing purposes. But you wouldn’t have known to do that, now would you?
Finally, why participate in the anonymous pen-name joke Mr. “Bill O’Reilly,” if you want this not to be a “Laughing matter?”
Please grow up, oh wait. You’re 30-years-old aren’t you?
Barrack Obama • Feb 21, 2012 at 12:18 pm
Funny how the girl’s picture that was originally posted with the article has suddenly disappeared. Legally speaking, if the UP “Re-tweeted” the picture and then posted it along with the article, isn’t that the same as the issue that is being brought up to being with. Not to mention the way this article is written makes it extremely biased and shows poor journalism skills, is’t Mariam the EIC? This looks more like some sort of teenager’s Tumblr instead of the award-winning Newspaper the UP once was. Nice way to end by saying, “someone should have just sat him down and said, AJ, stop being a scumbag,” That would have gotten you fired in the real-world.
Bret Farve • Feb 21, 2012 at 12:05 pm
The girl was auditioning for a show where she needed to be in her bikini anyway, so she was just volunteering early. I hear the jets are looking for a new massage therapist, she should apply now. You will have better luck being a gold digger in the NFL. As for the writer, GET OVER YOURSELF!
Bill O'Rielly • Feb 21, 2012 at 11:10 am
1: Nude is an adjective used to describe someone who is wearing no clothes. Synonyms include bare and unclothed. However, when I see the tweet-pic in question I see no nudity. What I saw was a female body from the shoulders down in lingerie, which is in fact an article of clothing. Hence, Miss Aldhahi’s introductory statement that a picture was posted of a “mostly nude” woman is incorrect and misleading. While I think you’re a great ink slinger, I’ve got to agree with the others and say that your journalistic skills are mediocre at best.
2: You make some serious allegations regarding invasion of privacy, however you seem to leave out some facts. For example, the Tweet mentions no names, there is no picture of a face, or of any other identifiable features. Hence, no one can be properly identified in that photo. If anything, this anonymous girl is coming out and claiming this picture to be hers when to any viewer that picture can easily be of any random female. Furthermore, we can assume that if she ONLY sent that picture to Jordat, no one else would know who the picture was of anyways. So I need to ask, how did Gideon Grudo know it was her? After all, he is the one who made the anonymous girl aware of this.
3: If there is an underlying relationship between the former EIC and this anonymous female, then this whole story becomes clouded with ethics questions. Especially considering that the writer of this article is well aware of the situation.
How do I know? Because my name isn’t really Bill O’Rielly… It’s AJ Jordat, and while I think all the pen names assumed by the previous commentators are funny, this is no laughing matter.
I used a provocative picture to promote an upcoming episode of “Sex & The University” on Twitter. An episode which deals with the topic of digital dating and seeks to educate viewers on the dangers of digital phenomenons like “sexting.” And, these pictures are no more or less risqué than the images shown in some of our programming such as “Hooter Hottie.” Furthermore, this content is rated PG in comparrison to all the images we are exposed to on TV on a daily basis.
Then, through the influence of staff at the University Press, this anonymous female claims a photo she submitted for “Hooter Hottie” was improperly used for a promotional piece. She goes on to claim that she didn’t know her photo would be posted. Yet, all models who audition for the show have their audition pictures posted online. In addition, the photo-shoot for “Hooter Hottie” consists of costume, swimwear, and lingerie pictures which would have been put on tv and the Internet anyways.
And, if you really want to claim that I violated this girl’s privacy, you need to turn around and take a look at yourselves. The staff at the University Press turned around and retweeted that same picture exposing this unidentifiable picture to countless other followers on the Internet.
In short, I’d like to inform you that your journalism is off and skewed; injected with high quantity of bias opinion while lacking truth and facts. This is nothing more than just another personal attack by the University Press. This is unfortunate because it comes off as a stupid pissing match between media outlets. Unfortunately I need to keep pissing to put out the fires that Mariam Aldhahi, Gideon Grudo and others at the newspaper keep igniting.
Please understand that if we were all in the “real world” and working under the same umbrella organization and had this beef, we would have all been fired. So when people make comments like “this guy should be fired” or “I don’t know why he was hired in the first place,” it simply shows a distorted outlook. I have my job because I was able to take a media outlet that was left with four employees and turn it into an organization with over 45 staff and volunteers. I brought OwlTV to the new dorms on campus after Comcast didn’t include our tv station in those dorms. We produced live sports coverage for our athletic departments, and numerous videos for school organizations. We are about to launch tv stations on other FAU campsus, and began a mobile app to further promote not only OwlTV but all Student Media at FAU. More importantly, I have a crew who backs and supports me 100%. Also, When I have a student, a female student-staffer no less, leave comments on OwlTV’s Facebook wall that say “I’m officially something important! Thank You OwlTV” then I know I’m doing my job.
As far as being called a “scumbag,” I’ve been called worse. Despite the fact that you guys are constantly attacking me, I look forward to all your weekly issues.
See You Next Tuesday
Ndamukong Suh • Feb 21, 2012 at 10:28 am
It’s surprising to see the same newspaper showing sympathy for a girl who willingly sent provocative pictures of herself, but bash a girl who got raped, calling her a liar. Why do that? You dug to get both sides of that story, so why not try to get both sides for this story?
Oprah Winfrey • Feb 21, 2012 at 1:04 am
From a female’s perspective, if a lady wants to keep a good reputation, she shouldn’t be sending pictures of herself to random boys anyways. Everybody knows that sending provocative pictures through phones exposes you to nearly every body. For example, if this guy wanted to show his friends the picture, he could’ve easily done it and therefore 50 other people could’ve received it. Women have to be careful of how they show themselves to complete strangers, something she didn’t really consider not knowing how the ‘complete stranger’ could react to such picture. Also, if she wanted to do a “Hooter Hottie of the Week,” she knew she was going to be exposed to social media anyways. If you look on the the “Hooter Hottie” Facebook page, every girl who auditions is “mostly nude” and featured on the website. She consented to the situation for if she actually won, she was going to be on T.V., Facebook, and Twitter; and she wouldn’t audition for something if she didn’t want it, right?
Ben Stiller • Feb 20, 2012 at 11:57 pm
Concluding sentence of the article: “All of this when, really, someone should have just sat him down and said, AJ, stop being a scumbag.”
I’m sorry, but this is not something a professional reporter for a paper that wants to be respected writes. I can fully understand the outrage, and I sympathize with the poor woman, but is this really how an ostensibly objective media outlet should be handling it? With male-bashing and ad hominem attacks? I sincerely doubt the Dean and Director gave you political doublespeak because they’re misogynistic enablers of the patriarchy or whatever the proper term is. Political hot air is a phenomenon common to both sexes.
To conclude, I agree with the substance of what you’re saying but not the angle you’re taking to say it; AJ should probably be fired or at least reprimanded severely, and at a minimum the young woman deserves a full apology, but let’s leave the feminist agenda out of it and focus on what happened the neutral, unbiased manner that it deserves.
Adam Sandler • Feb 20, 2012 at 10:41 pm
It would have been nice to have seen some decent reporting done aside from publishing your qualms on privacy. In all seriousness, AJ needs to be fired. This is not the first stupid stunt he has pulled. This is an embarrassment for Owl TV that reflects poorly on Student Media. It makes me wonder as to why he was hired in the first place.
Bob Barker • Feb 20, 2012 at 9:54 pm
not the prize winning journalism we had when i was the art director…. :'(
i do think that there should have been a womens input on it, but you have written this a slight bit slanted towards a certain direction that made me stop reading halfway through and start a response (i did finish reading it before hitting send though).